 |
AAPS 2001 Annual Meeting and Exposition
Pharmaceutical Sciences: Climbing New Heights
October 21-25
Colorado Convention Center
Denver, CO
Headquarters Hotel - Adams Mark
|
Tuesday
The Basics of Prodrugs
Sunrise Pharmacy School
Tuesday, October 23, 2001
7:00 am - 8:15 am
Prodrugs are pharmacologically inactive derivatives of an active drug designed
to ameliorate some identified, undesirable physical or biological property. The
physical properties are usually solubility (too much or not enough lipid or
aqueous solubility) or stability related, while problematic biological
properties include too rapid metabolism or poor bioavailability which itself
may be related to a physicochemical property. For each undesirable property a
functional group(s) can usually be identified as being a major source of the
undesirable property. A promoiety comprised of functional groups designed to
change that property is then transiently attached to the problematic functional
group with an enabling group that release the active drug at the appropriate
time.
This instructional program will provide insights into implementing these steps
in the development of a prodrug approach. The respective advantages of alkyl
and acyl promoieties in the design drugs and the importance of the inclusion of
lipid and aqueous solubility considerations in the design of the prodrug will
be discussed. Finally, examples of the use of prodrugs to improve topical and
oral delivery and extrapolation of animal models to human applications will be
provided.
Speaker
Kenneth B. Sloan, Ph.D.
University of Florida
PK/PD: Implications for Drug Approval
Sunrise Pharmacy School
Tuesday, October 23, 2001
7:00 am - 8:15 am
In this Sunrise Session, the basic understanding of the relationship between
plasma concentration and pharmacodynamic endpoints and/or surrogate markers to
clinical endpoints, and regulatory perspective of PK/PD as an
alternative/support to the well-controlled efficacy study in registering a new
drug product will be discussed.
Moderators
Vijay Tammara, Ph.D.
Sanofi-Synthelabo, Inc.
Jürgen Venitz, MD, Ph.D.
Virginia Commonwealth University
General Concepts of PK/PD Modeling
Mohammad Hossain, Ph.D.
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
PK/PD Considerations in Drug Development: A Regulatory Perspective
Vijay Tammara, Ph.D.
Sanofi-Synthelabo, Inc.
Analytical Laboratory Management Systems
Open Session
Tuesday, October 23, 2001
7:00 am - 8:15 am
FDA is progressing to agree on the format and content of a common technical
document for the registration of chemistry, manufacturing and controls
documents. One estimate named 133 technical documents in the CMC section, many
of which will have analytical input. The analyst will be required to provide
data and documents to support registration.
Meanwhile, electronic batch record initiatives and electronic signatures are
driving the need for electronic reports to be issued from the QC laboratories
directly into the batch records and to Annual Reports.
This session will provide an update on the progress of these initiatives,
explain the approach some companies are making to build an electronic
architecture capable of entering data directly into the document, and finally
assess the impact on the analytical laboratory, especially on LIMS.
Topics to be discussed include: LIMS in 200X, exporting data to the CTD and
batch records; special modules for LIMS, stability, calibration, maintenance,
sample handling;
setting up an analytical LIMS to meet scientific and business needs.
Moderator
G.W. “Bill” Martin, Ph.D.
Analytical Resources, LLC
Emerging Technologies: Regulatory Aspects and Detecting Solid-State Changes
During Drug Development
Symposium
Tuesday, October 23, 2001
8:30 am - 12:00 pm
ACPE Program Number: 073-999-01-218-L04
This symposium, organized by the AAPS Preformulation Focus Group, will examine:
(a) the impact of the FDA Q6A specification guideline on the drug development
process with a particular focus on characterizing the solid-state form of API
in the final drug product and (b) methods to detect potential solid-state
changes during formulation development and storage. It has been well
established that changes in solid-state form may adversely impact product
performance and shelf life of the commercial dosage form. Although much
research is conducted to identify an acceptable solid-state form for
development, few techniques are available to rapidly assess changes in the
physical stability of that form during the development and storage of the final
product, e.g., blending, wet granulation, tableting. The focus of this
symposium will be to describe new techniques to characterize drug substance in
drug products without disrupting the integrity of the solid-state form.
Initially, the Q6A guidelines will be reviewed by a representative from the
FDA, with an emphasis on the practical ways in which pharmaceutical scientists
can address the points that are raised. The use of well established
spectroscopic techniques, such an NMR and Raman, for characterizing the API
form in drug product will then be reviewed by experts in the field. The
symposium will conclude with reports of how recent advances in the application
of newer techniques and variants, such as low temperature X-ray powder
diffractometry and micro-thermal analysis, that can be used to address the
difficult problems in this field.
Moderators
Joseph F. Krzyzaniak, Ph.D.
Pfizer, Inc.
Bruno C. Hancock, Ph.D.
Pfizer, Inc.
Pharmaceutical Solids: Regulatory Perspective
Charles P. Hoiberg, Ph.D.
Food and Drug Administration
Solid-State NMR Spectroscopy of Small Molecules: From NMR Crystallography
to the Characterization of Solid Oral Dosage Forms
Susan M. Reutzel-Edens, Ph.D.
Eli Lilly and Company
Raman Spectroscopy as a Tool to Probe Solid-State Form in Tablets
Lynne S. Taylor, Ph.D.
AstraZeneca, Sweden
Use of X-Ray Powder Diffractometry to Monitor Phase Transitions During
Processing
Raj Suryanarayanan, Ph.D.
University of Minnesota
MicroTA: An Innovative Tool for Microscale Topography and Thermal Analysis
for Pharmaceutical Systems
Gerard P. Frunzi, Ph.D.
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
Lipid-Based Prodrug Products and Technology: Regulatory and Development Issues
Symposium
Tuesday, October 23, 2001
8:30 am - 12:00 pm
ACPE Program Number: 073-999-01-219-L04
This symposium is organized by the AAPS Lipid-Based Drug Delivery Systems Focus
Group. In the past, the pharmaceutical use of lipids was primarily limited to
drug delivery formulations (liposomes, micelles). Over the past decade there
has been a recognition that lipids covalently bound to pharmacological agents
can direct drug action to specific tissues and organs. This has led to a major
increase in the use of lipids conjugated to drugs so as to create a lipid-based
prodrug. These New Chemical Entities are designed to improve tissue/organ
targeting, penetration across membrane barriers (such as the blood brain
barrier) and pharmacokinetic profiles, with the added potential benefits of
reduced toxicity and/or improved efficacy.
Speakers will highlight recent developments in lipid-based prodrug technology
and the resulting diagnostic and therapeutic products. Since lipid-based
prodrugs represent New Chemical Entities and unique composition of matter, the
session will deal not only with the development of these novel products but
also address the regulatory issues involved. Traditional drug delivery
development and regulatory strategies will probably not apply to these
prodrugs, so companies pursuing new products will be breaking new ground. The
speakers will discuss a range of products and applications spanning the
delivery of small organic molecules to DNA vectors for this exciting new
technological approach, as well as the formulation challenges for these
lipophilic substances. Should the pioneering companies and researchers in
this field continue to achieve developmental success, it will certainly
convince more biotech and traditional pharmaceutical companies to consider
lipid-based prodrug products for enhancing product pipelines.
Moderators
Leonid Lurya, M.D., Ph.D.
Kiryat Weizmann Science Park, Israel
Jonathan E. Friedman, Ph.D.
Kiryat Weizmann Science Park, Israel
Fatty Acid- and Glyceride-Drug Conjugates as Prodrugs
Didier M. Lambert, Ph.D.
Université Catholique de Louvain, Belgium
Fine Tuning of Drug Action with Modified Polar Lipids
Alex Kozak, Ph.D.
Kiryat Weizmann Science Park, Israel
Cytofectin Mediated Delivery of Plasmid DNA: An “Informational” Prodrug
Carl J. Wheeler, Ph.D.
Vical, Inc.
DHA-Paclitaxel: Preclinical and Clinical Development of a Fatty Acid-Cytotoxic
Conjugate Targeted to Tumors
Matthew O. Bradley, Ph.D.
Protarga, Inc.
Lipid Formulations for Oral Administration of Hydrophobic Drugs Colin Pouton,
Ph.D.
University of Bath, United Kingdom
New Analytical Technology Applications For
In Situ
Analysis of Dosage
Forms
Symposium
Tuesday, October 23, 2001
8:30 am - 12:00 pm
ACPE Program Number: 073-999-01-220-L04
This session brings together industry and academic leaders in the field of
spectroscopy: Raman, Near-Infrared, NMR, Mass Spectroscopy, and Photon
Migration Spectroscopy. Speakers will demonstrate the utility of these varied
techniques in the analysis of dosage forms, in situ, in the presence of their
complex matrix structure.
Moderator
Emil W. Ciurczak, M.Sc.
Purdue Pharma L.P.
Application of X-Ray Powder Diffraction to Characterization of Solid Dosage
Forms
Marek Zakrzewski, Ph.D.
Purdue Pharma L.P.
Drug Product Analysis Using Raman Spectroscopy
David E. Bugay, Ph.D.
SSCI, Inc.
Implementation of Frequency Domain Photon Migration Measurement for Monitoring
and Validating Blend Uniformity
Eva Sevick-Muraca, Ph.D.
Texas A&M; University
Microscopic NMR Imaging Studies of Controlled Release Dosage Forms
Colin Fyfe, Ph.D.
University of British Columbia, Canada
High Resolution Spatial Chemical Analysis of Pharmaceutical Delivery Systems
Using Time of Flight Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry (ToF-SIMS)
Martyn C. Davies, Ph.D.
University of Nottingham, United Kingdom
Novel Tools to Study the Mechanisms, Expression and Regulation of Drug
Transporters
Symposium
Tuesday, October 23, 2001
8:30 am - 12:00 pm
ACPE Program Number: 073-999-01-221-L04
The discovery of drug transporters is occurring at an accelerated pace. The
latest and most advanced laboratory tools are needed to elucidate and
understand the mechanisms, expression and regulation of these drug
transporters. Such tools include model organisms (e.g., yeast, C. elegans),
GFP-tagging of the transporters to elucidate their intracellular sorting,
trafficking and targeting, and knockout models (e.g., yeast, C. elegans and
mouse). In addition, many of these tools can be used for rapid and high
throughput screening of transporters variants and for selection of lead
compounds. In this symposium, the what, how and why of these novel laboratory
tools will be discussed together with their optimum use, advantages and
disadvantages.
Moderators
Jashvant Unadkat, Ph.D.
University of Washington
Kathleen A. Giacomini, Ph.D.
University of California, San Francisco
A High Throughput Method for Mapping the Binding Sites of the Equilibrative
Nucleoside Transporter (hENT1) Using Yeast (Sacchromyces Cerevisiae) as an
Expression
System
Jashvant Unadkat, Ph.D.
University of Washington
Studies of Nucleoside Transporters In C. Elegans: What Can We Learn?
Kathleen A. Giacomini, Ph.D.
University of California, San Francisco
Intracellular Trafficking of Bile Canalicular Proteins: Models, Methods
and Mechanisms
Irwin M. Arias, M.D.
Tufts University School of Medicine
In Vitro
Cellular Models for Examining the Function and Regulation
of Hepatobiliary Transport Systems
Kim L.R. Brouwer, Pharm.D., Ph.D.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Analysis of ABC Transporter Trafficking and Polarization Using Green
Fluorescent
Protein and Confocal Mircoscopy
Bruce A. Stanton, M.D.
Dartmouth Medical School
PK/PD: Can It Be An Alternative/Support to a Well-Controlled Efficacy Study
for Registering a New Drug as Per FDAMA?
Symposium
Tuesday, October 23, 2001
8:30 am - 12:00 pm
ACPE Program Number: 073-999-01-222-L04
Compared to previous decades, the field of drug development has undergone major
changes in recent years. With emerging technology in the next century, the
current traditional clinical trial designs will be likely viewed as acceptable
but not comprehensive. Drug development is a question-driven process as to: a)
do we have the right drug?; If so, b) how do we appropriately administer it?
The various phases of traditional drug development that could answer these
questions include preclinical pharmacology and toxicology, Phase 1, Phase 2
(safety assessment and dose-response studies), and Phase 3 (efficacy studies)
trials. Where does pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) modeling fit in the
above drug development plan? Traditionally PK/PD has been a parallel effort in
drug development. However, the value of using PK/PD in each phase of drug
development is becoming increasingly evident to optimize and individualize dose
in general as well as in various compromised patient populations. In recent
years the pharmaceutical industry and the regulatory authority in the U.S.
(FDA) are interacting at regular intervals early to facilitate drug development
to determine as to “what ought to be done” and “what would be acceptable” in
contrast to past practices where FDA was informed of the drug development plans
for individual drugs that were in development. Further, with the enactment of
the Food and Drug Modernization Act (FDAMA), which provided for a provision
that the sponsor could provide one pivotal study to demonstrate efficacy and
safety of the drug with a supportive study which is either a well controlled
study or a study which can adequately support the concept of efficacy.
This symposium will explore the relationship between plasma concentration and
pharmacodynamic endpoints and/or surrogate markers to clinical endpoints and
regulatory perspective of PK/PD as an alternative/support to the well
controlled efficacy study in registering a new drug product.
Moderators
Vijay Tammara, Ph.D.
Sanofi-Synthelabo, Inc.
Jürgen Venitz, MD, Ph.D.
Virginia Commonwealth University
PK/PD-Based Development of Modified-Release Dosage Forms of Established
Drugs as an Alternative to Clinical Efficacy Testing
Hartmut Derendorf, Ph.D.
University of Florida
PK/PD as a Supportive Tool in Drug Development: An Industry Perspective
James Opperman, Ph.D.
Sanofi-Synthelabo, Inc.
Complexities and Frustrations in Using PK/PD for Regulatory Decisions: A
Clinical Pharmacology Perspective
Lawrence J. Lesko, Ph.D.
Food And Drug Administration
Use of PK/PD in Regulatory Decisions: Clinicial Perspective
Robert Temple, M.D.
Food and Drug Administration
PK/PD: Where Can it be Most Effective and Why Does it Fail?
Steven Bramer, Ph.D.
Maryland Research Institute
Streamlining the CMC Regulatory Process
Symposium
Tuesday, October 23, 2001
8:30 am - 12:00 pm
Room C205 / Colorado Convention Center
FDA and AAPS co-sponsored a workshop earlier in the year on new approach to
submitting and handling CMC information that, until now, required prior review
and several months of delay to approve and implement CMC changes. The Agency
has offered Industry the opportunity to discuss reducing the regulatory burden
for many types of changes. FDAMA required CDER review the post-approval change
process. The FDA has graciously opened the discussion on this process to
Industry comment and the first session in June was a tremendous success.
AAPS has allowed a session at the annual meeting to provide an update from that
workshop. The views discussed at the workshop are only proposals of what might
be changed. Some at the agency seem willing to think outside the current
“box”. The driving force for the new initiative is FDAMA's requirement for a
risk based reporting system for post approval submissions. FDA encouraged
discussion on a wide array of topics designed to reduce the regulatory burden
and promote CBE and Annual Report status for post-approval CMC change
requirements. The June workshop was just the beginning and this session offers
attendees the opportunity to participate in this change process. The speakers
will attempt to provide an general understanding of the history of 314.70,
FDAMA, SUPAC and other FDA guidances; update the current initiative and its
impact on existing guidances; and future direction. Although, these proposals
are designed to reduce the regulatory burden, they do not address the review
process. Are there potential actions related to this process to help relieve
the review burden, also.
Moderators
Jerry Skelly
Food and Drug Administration
Validation of Computerized Systems in Drug Development
Symposium
Tuesday, October 23, 2001
8:30 am - 12:00 pm
ACPE Program Number: 073-999-01-223-L04
This symposium will address issues related to computerized systems used to
create, maintain, retrieve or transmit pharmaceutical development data intended
for submission to the Food and Drug Administration as well as government
regulations and requirements. The essential elements of systems validation
requirements, electronic records and electronic signatures will also be
addressed. Case studies of prospective and retrospective validations will be
presented.
Moderators
Chris Bapatla, Ph.D.
Alcon Research, Ltd.
Joseph F. Mastronardy, Ph.D.
Quality Regulatory Consultants
FDA Regulations and Requirements for Its Validation of Computerized Systems
Paul Motise, Ph.D.
Food and Drug Administration
(Invited)
Computer Validation in Laboratories — Pharmaceutical Development
David Judd
Agilent Technologies
Auditing Computer Systems and Records
Martin Browning
EduQuest, Inc.
Integrity of Data Transfer from Original Measurements to Computerized Databases
and Data Verification
William Buote
VelQuest Corporation
The Value of Requirements Traceability Matrix (RTM) from User Requirements
Through Design Specifications and Testing
John Vadnais
RCM Solutions, Inc.
AAPS Graduate Symposium in Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics and Clinical
Sciences
Sponsored by Eli Lilly and Company
Tuesday, October 23, 2001
8:30 am - 12:00 pm
Graduate students whose research has been competitively judged to be
outstanding will present the findings of their research efforts. Special awards
will be given to the presenters at the conclusion of the session.
AAPS Graduate Symposium in Drug Delivery and Pharmaceutical Technology
Sponsored by Procter & Gamble Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Tuesday, October 23, 2001
8:30 am - 12:00 pm
Graduate students whose research has been competitively judged to be
outstanding will present the findings of their research efforts. Special awards
will be given to the presenters at the conclusion of the session.
Current Issues and Experiences with Electronic Signatures
Roundtable
Tuesday, October 23, 2001
9:00 am - 11:00 am
In March 1997, the FDA issued 21 CFR Part 11, Electronic Records; Electronic
Signatures; Final Rule. This regulation paved the way for acceptance by the FDA
of electronic records and electronic signatures. Four years later, many
questions continue to arise as to its interpretation and implementation. How
does one interpret this ruling? Has a norm arisen within the pharmaceutical
industry as to how and when electronic signatures are used? How are electronic
signatures being generated, verified? What is the current status of this
regulation within the FDA? Has the experience of the past four years revealed
major issues in either interpretation or the availability of acceptable
technology? These topics will be explored in this roundtable discussion.
Moderator
Joseph F. Mastronardy, Ph.D.
Quality Regulatory Consultants
FDA Perspective
Speaker To Be Announced
Industry Perspective
Donna M. Radzik, Ph.D.
Medeva Americas, Inc.
Emerging Drug Distribution Channels and Their Impact on Pharmacy and Patient
Care
Roundtable
Tuesday, October 23, 2001
9:00 am - 11:00 am
New technologies such as genomics, internet, and bioinformatics will likely
change the dynamics of the drug distribution channels in the new millennium.
Patients and healthcare professionals will be significantly impacted in the
ways they use information to make therapy decisions. The emerging innovative
technologies will also demand that drug therapy be designed and distributed via
newer channels to optimize patient therapy monitoring. The profession of
pharmacy will therefore have to address the impact of such events on the
practice of pharmacy and new roles for the pharmacist in patient care. The
roundtable will address these issues through a discussion of future alternative
models of drug distribution, the information-specialist role of the pharmacist
in the new drug distribution channels, and the impact of new drug distribution
channels on the pharmaceutical industry's relationships with physicians,
pharmacists, and patients.
Moderator
Prasanna R. Gore, Ph.D.
Gore & Company, a Division of PharmaCompany, Inc.
Emerging Technologies and Their Impact on Drug Distribution in the New
Millennium
Thani Jambulingam, Ph.D.
St. Joseph’s University
Influences of Emerging Methods of Drug Distribution on Pharmacy and Patient
Care in the New Millennium
William Doucette, Ph.D.
University of Iowa
Perspectives in Powder Flow Characterization
Roundtable
Tuesday, October 23, 2001
9:00 am - 11:00 am
The quality of pharmaceutical solid dosage forms can be impacted by the
flowability of the materials using the specified production process. From the
design of clinical and market formulations through production support, multiple
opportunities are presented for
measurement and observation of flow properties/flowability of the mixture.
Given the multivariate systems encountered, what measures are useful for
solving problems related to flow of the material? From historical measurement
techniques to compendial procedures, the choice of test method for generating
flowability data can add clarity or confuse the problem solving process. This
roundtable will use case studies to illustrate investigative processes and
measurement techniques for powder flowability. New techniques, established
testing procedures and proposed compendial methods will be discussed.
Moderator
Samir Mehta, Ph.D.
GlaxoSmithKline, Inc.
Powder Flow in Formulation Development
Dwayne A. Campbell, Ph.D.
GlaxoSmithKline, Inc.
Powder Flow in Process and Equipment Design
James K. Prescott, M.E.
Jenike and Johanson, Inc.
PQRI Proposal on Blend Uniformity Analysis
Tuesday, October 23, 2001
1:30 pm - 5:00 pm
Teambuilding and Communication are Essential for the Effective Performance of
Pharmaceutical Organizations
Education Committee Roundtable
12:00 pm - 1:30 pm
Pharmaceutical product development is a complex process and involves effective
communication, co-operation between the members of different functional areas
for accelerated development and global registration of the product. Many times
this may involove out-sourcing of work and/or a joint venture between two
multinational companies with different cultural backgrounds. The roundtable
will discuss the recent trends in high performance team building and effective
communication approaches taken by the industries. The presentation will be
helpful for graduate students, academic and industrial scientists.
Moderator
Prakash Parab, Ph.D.
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
Application of Multiplexing Binding Assays in the Quantification of Biomarkers
Symposium
Tuesday, October 23, 2001
1:30 pm - 5:00 pm
ACPE Program Number: 073-999-01-224-L04
Quantification of biomarkers can provide important information regarding the
activity, efficacy and toxicity of a candidate drug. This information is often
combined with traditional pharmacokinetic data to develop an understanding of
the drug’s concentration-effect relationship that aids in drug development.
However, the potential positive impact of biomarkers is often not realized
fully, as issues of sample volume and analytical costs often limit
investigation and assessment of biomarkers during preclinical and clinical
development. Thus, analytical strategies that overcome these limitations have
the potential to increase the utility of biomarkers.
Multiplexed binding assays comprise a novel nonisotopic binding assay
technology that permits the simultaneous determination of multiple analytes
within biological specimens. This technology, which combines the principles of
flow cytometry and binding assays into one analytical methodology, utilizes an
array of distinct sets of microspheres. The beads serve as the solid phase for
conducting the binding assay usually employing either an antibody or a DNA/RNA
primer. Each bead set is impregnated with a unique fluorescent spectral
address that serves to identify the binding reaction specificity. Detection is
achieved by means of a fluoresecent labeled reporter, usually a secondary
antibody, avidin or DNA/RNA primer. Since multiplexed binding assays offer the
advantage of simultaneously measuring multiple analyses within a biological
specimen, this technology should facilitate the identification and application
of
in vitro
assays for biomarkers within the pharmaceutical industry.
Moderator
Brian T. Edmonds, Ph.D.
Eli Lilly and Company
Application of Multiplexing Binding Assays in the Quantification of Biomarkers:
An Emerging Flow Cytometry Based Technology
Francis F. Mandy, B.Sc.
Health Canada, Canada
The Luminex LabMAP
™
System: A Rapid, Homogeneous,
Multiplexed Assay Platform
Lekha Patel, M.S.
R.W. Johnson Pharmaceutical Research Institute
Multiplexed Quantitation of Signal Transduction Pathways in Drug Discovery
Brian T. Edmonds, Ph.D.
Eli Lilly and Company
Microsphere-Based Studies of Nuclear Receptor Interactions
Marie A. Iannone, M.S.
GlaxoSmithKline, Inc.
Application Issues for Clinical Multiplexing Immunoassays of Cytokines
Chad A. Ray, M.S.
Eli Lilly and Company
Oral Dosage Form Development for Poorly Water-Soluble Drugs: Challenges and
Opportunities
Symposium
Tuesday, October 23, 2001
1:30 pm - 5:00 pm
ACPE Program Number: 073-999-01-225-L04
Sponsored by Zeneca Pharmaceuticals Group
Combinational chemistry and high-throughput screening are commonly used in the
discovery of new drug molecules. Both of these techniques favor the selection
of highly lipophilic and poorly water-soluble drug candidates, and dosage form
development of such compounds has become very challenging. Questions arise
during the drug development process: Does a compound have adequate solubility
to ensure dissolution under gastrointestinal (GI) pH conditions? What roles
might GI physiology play in its dissolution and bioavailability? What are
dose-to-solubility ratios in biorelevant media? What should formulation
strategies be to ensure oral absorption at preclinical and early clinical
development stages where dose requirements are relatively high? What are
technological challenges and limitations in the development of marketable
dosage forms for poorly water-soluble drugs? Can physiochemical properties of
drug substances be modified by particle engineering to enhance dissolution and
bioavailability? Are special drug delivery systems required? Is solid
dispersion a viable approach, and, if so, what are some of the new
opportunities in this approach? What are the challenges and opportunities in
the development of lipid-based drug delivery systems? The speakers will attempt
to answer most of these questions. Various developability issues with poorly
water-soluble drugs, as well as strategies for overcoming them by dosage form
design, will be presented.
Moderators
Abu Serajuddin, Ph.D.
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
Dharmendra Singhal, Ph.D.
Pfizer Global Research & Development
Assessing the Developability of Poorly Soluble Compounds
Jennifer B. Dressman, Ph.D.
Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität, Germany
Drug Candidate Selection and Early Development Strategies
Yatindra Joshi, Ph.D.
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
Molecular Pharmaceutics and Particle Engineering of Poorly Soluble Drugs
Peter York, Ph.D.
University of Bradford, United Kingdom
Bioavailability Enhancing Solid Dispersion Formulations Using Hydroxypropyl
Methyl Cellulose Acetate Succinate (HPMCAS)
Ravi Shanker, Ph.D.
Pfizer Global Research & Development
Lipid Formulations: Why, When and How?
Colin Pouton, Ph.D.
University of Bath, United Kingdom
Process Control of Solid Dosage Form Unit Operations
Symposium
Tuesday, October 23, 2001
1:30 pm - 5:00 pm
ACPE Program Number: 073-999-01-226-L04
This symposium will review and emphasize the critical controls for different
unit operations commonly involved in the manufacture of solid dosage forms. The
identification and illustration of critical control systems and their impact on
technology transfer, regulatory acceptance, and manufacturing process
capabilities will be discussed. Additionally, case studies of unit operations
will be presented, with the focus on identification and control of critical
process variables to ensure robust manufacturing operations.
Moderators
Colleen E. Ruegger, Ph.D.
Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation
Metin Celik, Ph.D.
Pharmaceutical Technologies International, Inc.
Overview of Process Control Systems for Solid Dosage Forms
Bhogi Sheth, Ph.D.
University of Tennessee
Control of Fluid Bed Wet Granulation Processing
David M. Jones
Glatt Air Techniques, Inc.
New Trends in the Production of Pharmaceutical Granules: Batch vs. Continuous
Processing
Hans Leuenberger, Ph.D.
Swiss Academy of Engineering Science, Switzerland
Optimization and Control of Roller Compactor Operating Parameters
Roman T. Dec, Ph.D.
K.R. Komarek Research, Inc.
Film Coating: Process Control During Pan Coating
Stuart C. Porter, Ph.D.
Pharmaceutical Technologies International, Inc.
Role of Drug Transporters in the Brain
Symposium
Tuesday, October 23, 2001
1:30 pm - 5:00 pm
ACPE Program Number: 073-999-01-227-L04
Little is known about the cellular and molecular mechanisms of drug transport
between blood and brain. This is unfortunate since the presence of tight
junctions between the endothelial cells that form the blood-brain barrier (BBB)
and the chorod plexus epithelial cells that form the blood-cerebrospinal fluid
barrier (BCSFB) limit paracellular movement. Thus, specific transporters are
required for the transcellular transport of hydrophilic compounds whether for
the movement of nutrients into the brain or toxins out of the brain. By taking
advantage of the unique structural and functional characteristics of these
barriers (i.e., asymmetry of carriers on the blood-facing and CSF-facing
membranes), it may be possible to target certain drugs to the brain.
Alternatively, it is possible that transporters mediate the efflux of ligands
from the brain, thus restricting their entry into the CNS from the circulating
blood. In addressing fundamental questions of drug transporter activity,
expression and significance, this symposium will have important implications
for the treatment of serious CNS disorders and for providing new strategies in
drug design, delivery and targeting to the brain.
Moderator
David E. Smith, Ph.D.
The University of Michigan
Drug Transporters at the Blood-Brain Barrier
William M. Pardridge, M.D.
University of California, Los Angeles
Role of Efflux Transporters for Organic Anions in the Blood Brain Barrier
and Blood CSF Barrier
Yuichi Sugiyama, Ph.D.
The University of Tokyo, Japan
Role of Organic Cation Transporters in the Brain
John B. Pritchard, Ph.D.
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
Peptide Transporters: Role in the Choroid Plexus
David E. Smith, Ph.D.
The University of Michigan
Role of MPR/MDR Transporters in the Brain
A .G. “Bert” de Boer, Ph.D.
Leiden University, The Netherlands
The Success and Challenges of Bioinformatics and Pharmacogenomics in Drug
Discovery and Development
Symposium
Tuesday, October 23, 2001
1:30 pm - 5:00 pm
ACPE Program Number: 073-999-01-229-L04
The pharmaceutical drug discovery process is continuously challenged to market
innovative and effacious drugs. Critical to improving and enhancing this
process and to reduce the cost of drug discovery and development, will be the
know how of using the latest development in technologies. Recent advances in
genomics and bioinformatics have led to the widespread utility of high
throughput screening methods to increase the success rate. However, they also
pose tremendous challenges for companies to continually improve their discovery
methods, and to tease out the most valuable information that is important in
drug discovery and development. The sciences that are involved in the
translation of a biological obervation to the creation of a new drug are also
ever-changing.
Symposium topics will include DNA-microarray platforms to identify new disease
markers and targets, and to characterize lead compounds, the utility of gene
expression arrays for novel target identification in the central nervous
system, expression profiling of cancer cells and treatment with anticancer
agents using DNA microarray, DNA-array technology to assess induction of genes
encoding drug metabolizing enzymes, and DNA-array technology to assess
toxicological response of xenobiotics and potential drug candidates in the
pipeline, will be presented. This information may have significant impact in
pharmaceutical drug discovery and development in the near future.
Moderator
A.-N. Tony Kong, Ph.D.
Rutgers University College of Pharmacy
Employing an Integrated RNA and Protein Expression Platform to Identify
New Disease Markers and Targets, and to Characterize Lead Compounds
Mark Egerton, Ph.D.
Incyte Genomics Ltd.
Using Gene Expression Arrays for Novel Target Identification in the Central
Nervous System
Lillian W. Chiang, Ph.D.
Millennium Pharmaceuticals
Gene Expression Studies Involving Functional Genomics and Informatics
Approaches
to Categorize Anticancer Agents and Drug Resistance of Tumor Cells
Khew-Voon Chin, Ph.D.
The Cancer Institute of New Jersey
Molecular Biological Approaches for High-Throughput Screening of Cytochrome
P450 Induction in Drug Discovery
Thomas H. Rushmore, Ph.D.
Merck and Company
Using Gene Expression Profiles for Studying Signaling Mechanisms and Responses
of Xenobiotics
A.-N. Tony Kong, Ph.D.
Rutgers University College of Pharmacy
Utility of Various Commercial Software Packages to Expedite Clinical Drug
Development
Symposium
Tuesday, October 23, 2001
1:30 pm - 5:00 pm
ACPE Program Number: 073-999-01-228-L04
Clinical drug development for a typical New Chemical Entity (NCE) normally
takes between four and seven years and costs an estimated $100 to $400 million.
The attrition rate is around 80%, even after NCEs have been shown in animals to
be safe and possess desirable pharmacological activity. Recent advances in
clinical study design, laboratory automation and robotics, and new initiatives
by regulatory agencies have decreased clinical development time and costs to
some extent. However, computer technology advances have also resulted in very
significant paradigm changes in how pharmaceutical companies conduct, execute,
and complete regulatory submissions of NCEs.
Over the past 25 years, the computation tools used to support pharmacokinetic
and pharmacodynamic analysis have evolved freeing the pharmaceutical scientist
from the burden of cutting and weighing AUCs, sorting through stacks of cards,
and/or loading magnetic tape. The advent of the PC and its continued maturation
have brought computationally-intensive modeling techniques to the desktop and
removed some of the coding burden. With these advances, the desire to assemble
data across the lifetime of a chemical entity has become attainable. In
addition, the necessity to mine historical data within a compound’s development
and across compounds within a therapeutic area has become a current challenge
for many companies as they seek to streamline development costs and eliminate
redundancy. These efforts directly coincide with the regulatory and document
management efforts to provide data for an electronic submission. Several
attractive solutions are available to meet the needs of today’s pharmaceutical
companies in this arena. They differ in scope, data management backbone, and
interface. This session will examine and critically evaluate a number of
approaches that use computer systems and applications to address the growing
pressures to shorten development times and improve success rates from a variety
of perspectives including data management/mining resources, modeling and
simulation methods, and regulatory compliance with 21 CFR part 11. As these
technologies evolve, forums such as these are an invaluable way for the
scientist/consumer to voice opinions about the current status of these products
and for the commercial vendors to learn how the scientific community feels
about their products.
Moderators
Henry J. Pieniaszek, Ph.D.
DuPont Pharmaceuticals
Jeffrey S. Barrett, Ph.D.
DuPont Pharmaceuticals
Use of Modeling, Simulation, and Information Technology to Improve Clinical
Trials and Development Decisions
William F. Ebling, Ph.D.
Pharsight Corporation
PK Sirius as an Integrated Scientific Information Management System and
Review Tool
Sasa Lu, Ph.D.
Sirius Knowledge Systems, Inc.
Accelerating Early Clinical Development and Achieving Part 11 Compliance
Through Protocol-Driven, Study-Based Analysis, Management and Reporting
Richard S. Wagner
InnaPhase Corporation
A New Chemical Entity(NCE) Web Portal for Phase I and II Analysis Ready
Data
Michael Roberson
Ibiomatics/SAS
Current Topics in Medicinal and Natural Products Chemistry
Poster Podium
Tuesday, October 23, 2001
1:30 pm - 5:00 pm
Authors will present papers selected from abstracts submitted for the poster
sessions. Representative papers concerning drug design, computational
chemistry and natural products drug discovery will be featured.
Moderator
Bruce L. Currie, Ph.D.
South Dakota State University
Recent Advances in Drug Delivery
Poster Podium
Tuesday, October 23, 2001
1:30 pm - 5:00 pm
Authors whose research in the area of drug delivery and pharmaceutical
technology has been competitively judged to be outstanding and novel will
present their work at this podium. All authors will address a specific topic.
The papers will also be displayed on a poster board inside the room.
Moderator
Vishal K. Gupta, Ph.D.
Pharmacia Corporation
AAPS Graduate Symposium in Analysis and Pharmaceutical Quality
Sponsored by Celltech Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Tuesday, October 23, 2001
1:30 pm - 5:00 pm
Graduate students whose research has been competitively judged to be
outstanding will present the findings of their research efforts. Special awards
will be given to the presenters at the conclusion of the session.
AAPS Graduate Symposium in Biotechnology
Sponsored by G.D. Searle and Company
Tuesday, October 23, 2001
1:30 pm - 5:00 pm
Graduate students whose research has been competitively judged to be
outstanding will present the findings of their research efforts. Special
awards will be given to the presenters at the conclusion of the session.
Building Credible Simulations
Roundtable
Tuesday, October 23, 2001
2:00 pm - 4:00 pm
One of the most difficult tasks for a simulation scientist is not building the
model, but the conveyance to an outside audience of the simulation’s
credibility or level of confidence. Simulations with low credibility are of
questionable value and lead to wasted resources. This roundtable will discuss
criteria that can be used to develop credible simulations which can then be
used in the decision-making process.
Moderator
Peter L. Bonate, Ph.D.
Quintiles
Qualification of Models for Simulation
Hui C. Kimko, Ph.D.
Georgetown University, Center for Drug Development Science
Validating Models — One Size Does Not Fit All
Mark E. Sale, M.D.
GlaxoSmithKline, Inc.
GMP Audit Guidelines For Excipients
Roundtable
Tuesday, October 23, 2001
2:00 pm - 4:00 pm
This roundtable will define appropriate standards of Good Manufacturing
Practices for the manufacture of excipients. The IPEC America perspective and
views will be presented as well as a discussion on the European Community (EC)
draft directive on starting materials.
Moderators
Janice Cacace
Pformulate.com
Chris Bapatla, Ph.D.
Alcon Research Ltd.
Transcriptional Regulation of Drug Metabolizing Enzymes: Novel Tools to Study
Human CYP Induction
Symposium
Tuesday, October 23rd
1:30 pm - 5:00 pm
Moderator
Pankaj B. Desai, Ph.D.
University of Cincinnati Medical Center
The Pregnane X Receptor: A Promiscuous Xenobiotic Receptor that Regulates
Multiple CYP Genes
Bryan J. Goodwin, Ph.D.
GlaxoSmithKline
Nuclear Orphan Receptor CAR and Drug Induction of P450 Genes
Masahiko Negishi, Ph.D.
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
Transcriptional Control of Intestinal CYP3A4 Mediated by the Vitamin D3 Receptor
Kenneth I. Thummel, Ph.D.
University of Washington
The Use of Human Hepatocytes for Drug Induction and Metabolism Studies
Stephen Strom, Ph.D.
University of Pittsburgh
Humanized Xenobiotic Response in Transgenic Mice Expressing Human Nuclear
Receptors
Wen Xie, M.D., Ph.D.
The Salk Institute for Biological Studies
An Overview of GMP Requirements for the Manufacture of Excipients
Speaker To Be Announced
FDA Speaker Invited
Excipient Industry Perspective
Irwin B. Silverstein, Ph.D.
IPEC America
Back To Top
|