Baas B, Kindt K, Scott A, Scott J, Mikulecky P and Hartsel SC Activity and Kinetics of Dissociation and Transfer of Amphotericin B from a Novel Delivery Form AAPS PharmSci 1999;
1
(3)
article 10
(https://www.pharmsci.org/scientificjournals/pharmsci/journal/99_10.html).
Activity and Kinetics of Dissociation and Transfer of Amphotericin B from a Novel Delivery Form
Submitted: April 26, 1999; Accepted: August 5, 1999; Published: August 21, 1999
Bradley Baas1, Katie Kindt1, Angela Scott1, Jessica Scott1, Peter Mikulecky1 and Scott C. Hartsel1
1Department of Chemistry, University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire, Eau Claire, Wisconsin 54702
Correspondence to: Scott C. Hartsel Telephone: (715) 836-4746 Facsimile: (715) 836-4979 E-mail: hartsesc@uwec.edu
|
Keywords: HAmB-DOC
|
Abstract
Recently it has been demonstrated that moderate heat treatment
of Amphotericin B/deoxycholate solutions (HAmB-DOC) leads to a therapeutically
interesting supramolecular rearrangement that can be observed by significant
changes in light scattering, CD, and absorbance. In this study, we continue the
investigation of the physical properties of this new form by evaluating the
activity and kinetics of dissociation and dispersion of HAmB-DOC and AmB-DOC in
saline, serum, and in model mammalian or fungal lipid biomimetic membrane
vesicles. Stopped-flow spectrophotometry combined with singular value
decomposition (SVD) and global analysis were used to resolve the components of
this process. The dissociation kinetics for both states are complex, requiring
multi-exponential fits, yet in most cases SVD indicates only two significant
changing species representing the monomer and the aggregate. The kinetic
mechanism could involve dissociation of monomers from coexisting
spectroscopically similar but structurally distinct aggregates or sequential
rearrangements in supramolecular structure of aggregates. Rate constants and
amplitudes of dissociation from aggregates to monomer in buffer, whole serum,
10% cholesterol, and ergosterol membrane vesicles are generally greater for
AmB-DOC, demonstrating its greater kinetic instability. In addition, at
comparable low concentrations, HAmB-DOC and AmB-DOC are nearly equally active at
promoting cation selective permeability in ergosterol-containing membranes;
however, HAmB-DOC is much less active against mammalian mimetic
cholesterol-containing vesicles, despite a higher level of self-association,
supporting previous observations that there exists a specific "toxic aggregate"
structure.

Introduction
Abbreviations used: AmB, Amphotericin B; AmB-DOC, Amphotericin B/deoxycholate 5:4
(wt/wt) mixture; HAmB-DOC, Amphotericin B/deoxycholate 5:4 mixture heat-treated;
LUV, large unilamellar vesicle(s); SUV, small unilamellar vesicle(s); FCCP,
carbonyl cyanide p- (trifluoromethoxy) phenylhydrazone; egg PC, egg
phosphatidylcholine; HDL, high density lipoproteins; LDL, low density
lipoproteins.
Amphotericin B (AmB) is a polyene macrolide antibiotic used to
effectively combat systemic fungal infections, yet its utilization as an
antifungal agent is inhibited by high acute and chronic toxicity, characterized
by chills, fever, nausea, vomiting, and nephrotoxicity1-3. AmB's
selectivity for fungi is thought to hinge on its enhanced ability to form ion
channels in ergosterol-rich fungal membranes versus mammalian cholesterol-rich
membranes. Nonetheless, AmB can also damage mammalian membranes by a similar
mechanism, causing the host of serious side effects observed. Newer liposomal
and lipid-associated drug delivery mixtures have been developed and tested and
seem to reduce the drug's toxicity by reducing the concentration of free
AmB in solution to below a certain threshold. When AmB in solution is below the
threshold of AmB self-association, toxicity against fungi is still observed but
human toxic effects decline (see1,3 for a recent review). In the current
model of AmB selective toxicity, soluble monomeric AmB is very active toward
ergosterol-containing membranes, but a soluble self-associated oligomer damages
sterol-free and cholesterol-containing membranes4,5. In addition, the
oligomer seems to be more susceptible to autooxidation, which may enhance its
toxicity6-8.
Three lipid-associated pharmaceutical preparations are
currently on the market: AmBisome (Fujisawa Healthcare, Deerfield, IL), Amphotec
(Alza, Palo Alto, CA), and Abelcet (Liposome, Princeton, NJ). They are
fundamentally different physically: AmBisome is a true closed liposomal bilayer
preparation, Amphotec is a micellar solution with cholesteryl sulfate, and
Abelcet is an interdigitated lipid dispersion1. Despite these differences,
they all possess a far superior therapeutic index to the original micellar
commercial preparation consisting of AmB: deoxycholate (AmB-DOC) in a mole ratio
of ~1:2 (Fungizone; Bristol Myers-Squibb, Princeton, NJ)2. As promising as
these new preparations are, their universal adoption may be hampered by their
great expense, particularly in the Third World, where AIDS-related fungal
infections are rampant. As a potential simple and inexpensive alternative,
Bolard and Gaboriau8,9 have discovered that AmB or AmB-DOC solutions may be
treated with moderate heat (70°C for 20 minutes) to produce a new
self-associated state of AmB, the "superaggregate," which we will refer to as
heat-treated AmB-DOC (HAmB-DOC). This new species is spectroscopically distinct
from AmB-DOC, with a blue-shifted absorption maximum and characteristic CD
spectrum. This preparation has been shown to be much less cytotoxic in vitro. In
addition, hemolysis, usually used as an indicator of potential human toxicity,
is strongly inhibited by this heat treatment process. In model murine
infections, HAmB-DOC has recently been shown to have a superior therapeutic
index10. This superaggregate species is fascinating both for the possible
practical therapeutic benefits and for its potential for explaining the root
mechanisms for toxicity reduction in the simplest possible improved Amphotericin
B drug delivery system. In this report, we continue the investigation of the
physical properties of this new form by evaluating the kinetics of dissociation
and dispersion of HAmB-DOC and AmB-DOC in saline, serum, and in model lipid
membrane vesicles. Stopped-flow and singular value decomposition (SVD) and
global analysis were used to resolve the components of this process. In
addition, we directly compare the abilities of these two forms to induce ion
channels in model fungal and mammalian mimetic membrane systems.

Materials and Methods
Materials
All lipids were purchased from Avanti Polar Lipids (Alabaster,
AL). Purified Amphotericin B was a generous gift from Bristol-Myers Squibb
Pharmaceuticals (Princeton, NJ). AmB-DOC as Fungizone (Bristol-Myers Squibb
Pharmaceuticals) was purchased from a commercial supplier. FCCP (carbonyl
cyanide p- (trifluoromethoxy) phenylhydrazone), cholesterol, and ergosterol were
obtained from Sigma Chemical (St. Louis, MO). The sterols were recrystallized
from ethanol 3X before use. Valinomycin, a K+ ionophore, was purchased from
CalBiochem (La Jolla, CA). Laser-grade pyranine (1,3,6-pryrenetrisulfonic
acid) was purchased from Eastman-Kodak (Rochester, NY). Whole bovine serum was
obtained from Sigma Chemical and had to be diluted 6:1 in PBS due to the high
absorbance of the serum between 300 and 400 nm.
HAmB-DOC was made by heating a 100 mM (in AmB) solution of
Fungizone dissolved in phosphate buffered saline (PBS; 155 mM NaCl, 7mM Na2HPO4,
3 mM KH2PO4, pH 7.4) to 70°C in water bath for 20 minutes. AmB-DOC stocks
were removed from the same preparation before heating. Both preparations were
purged with argon and kept in darkness to prevent oxidation. In order to
determine whether the heating may have caused chemical as well as physical
changes in the AmB, HPLC and absorption spectroscopy were used. Briefly,
aliquots of AmB-DOC and HAmB-DOC were diluted 10:1 into methanol for
spectroscopy or into acetonitrile for HPLC analysis. Absorbance spectral peaks
of both preparations in methanol were identical within the 0.2-nm resolution of
the Cary-14 spectrophotometer and the intensities changed < 5% after heating.
Gradient reversed-phase HPLC (Poros R2 medium; PerSeptive Biosystems,
Framingham, MA) using a 20-60% water/acetonitrile gradient showed only a single
peak at 415 nm, with identical retention times for both preparations. The two
most likely chemical modifications of AmB upon heating would be oxidation of the
polyene backbone or cleavage of the lactone ring. The former would lead to a
disappearance or serious alteration of the characteristic methanol spectrum, and
the latter would be expected to alter the retention time by HPLC. Since neither
of these methods showed a significant change for AmB properties after heating,
it is a reasonable assumption that the differences observed here are due solely
to supramolecular structure changes.
Preparation and Assay of Lipid Vesicle Samples for Ion Permeability and Binding Studies
The lipids were dispersed in a 15 mM K2HPO4, 2 mM pyranine
buffer with 200 mM KCl at pH 7.20 for ion permeability studies or in PBS for
kinetic dilution and distribution studies. The lipid dispersions were then
freeze-thawed and extruded ten times through 200 nm (with Lipex unit only)
followed by 100 nm Nucleopore filters using a pressure (Lipex, Vancouver, BC) or
manual (Avanti Polar Lipids) extruder to make large unilamellar vesicles (LUV)
of ca. 100 nm diameter. Where present, the external pyranine solution was
removed and exchanged with a 15-mM K2HPO4 osmotically balanced (with sucrose)
buffer through gel filtration with Sephadex G-25, thus forming a (K+) gradient
of 6.67 K+in /K+ out across the membrane. 3 mM FCCP was added to
pyranine-containing vesicles to allow for free equilibration of H+ ions.
Measurement of K+, Cl-, and Net Ion Currents in LUV
Ion currents were measured by fluorescence with an Applied
Photophysics SX.18MV stopped-flow spectrophotometer with a 500-nm cutoff filter
in place. Stopped-flow techniques for measuring ion currents using the pH
sensitive dye pyranine as a reporter molecule have been developed over the past
few years, and the concentrations, data handling, interpretation, and other
experimental conditions were essentially identical to those in Ruckwardt et al.
11. For the current studies, HAmB-DOC and AmB-DOC were introduced to vesicles
from a buffer identical to the column exchange buffer via stopped flow syringes
of 1:11 or 1:26 dilution ratios to the final concentrations at thermostatted
temperature (37.0 ± 0.5°C). The final total lipid concentration was
1.1 mg/ml. Our assay measures pH changes inside the LUV that result from the AmB
induced net K+ currents. The net flux of K+ (or any ion) across a membrane
vesicle is electrogenic, i.e., it generates a transmembrane voltage that can be
approximated by the Nernst equation if perfect selectivity is seen. The
incorporation of the protonophore FCCP into the LUV allows H+ to move rapidly
across the membrane, and it will quickly come to equilibrium with this
transmembrane voltage. The imposed salt gradients coupled with the ionophoric
action of AmB lead to an H+ for K+ (or Cl-) exchange that is limited by the rate
of AmB induced K+ or Cl- efflux. Under our conditions, according to the Nernst
equation, ideal K+ selectivity at low buffer capacity should produce a final pH
difference of -0.82. The pyranine molecules entrapped in the target LUV provide
a sensitive fluorescence assay for detecting this resulting interior vesicular
pH change. The fluorescence intensity of the pyranine is linear between about
7.8 and 6.4, and so fluorescence intensity was converted directly to internal
pH. Hence, these amphotericin-induced ion currents can be observed as a dynamic
change in pH, and AmB membrane activity is reported as change in pH/second. In
the present experimental configuration, a fluorescence decrease indicates K+
> Cl- selectivity and an increase would follow from Cl- > K+ selectivity.
In each case, a baseline fluorescence change of LUV in the absence of AmB was
subtracted from the data to rule out nonspecific defects and leaks as a source
of the observed change in fluorescence. The K+ ionophore valinomycin was used as
a perfectly K+ selective control. In all cases, AmB produced cation selective
channels/defects (fluorescence decrease) close to expected Nernst potentials.
Measurement of Absorption and CD Kinetics and Steady-State Spectra and Data Analysis
Kinetic photodiode array spectral series were taken using a
microvolume stopped-flow reaction analyzer (Applied Photophysics, U.K., and
SX.18MV). Spectral series were measured at 37°C from 300 to 450 nm using a
diode array detector with an integration time of 10.080 ms. The mixing chamber
had a 1.0-cm pathlength, and a monochrometer slit width was generally fixed at
0.5 mm entry and 0.2 mm exit. Oversampling was employed with a 200- or
500-second log time base. All samples were protected from light to prevent
photo-oxidation of AmB. SVD and global analysis software from Applied
Photophysics was used for data analysis. Steady-state CD spectra were taken
using the Applied Photophysics CD attachment.
SVD analysis can be used to suggest a minimum number of
species contributing to a spectral family12,13. As an example of this
process, we will inspect the time-dependent (200 seconds) spectral change of
HAmB-DOC diluted 11:1 (100mM to 9.1 mM) into 10 mole percent ergosterol/egg PC
LUV (total (lipid) = 1.1 mg/ml). The time dependent absorbance data matrix, A,
can be decomposed into an output data matrix where A = USVT where V (see column
1, Figure 1) is the matrix of the time-dependent
amplitudes and matrix U (see column 2, Figure 1)represents the basis spectra.
When the first several singular values (the diagonal matrix S,
Figure 1, column 3) in a set of spectra are inspected, it
is usually straightforward to estimate the rank of the data matrix A since the
singular values will plateau. By inspection of the data in Figure 1, it can be concluded that there are only two
significantly changing species. Hence a model-free assessment of the number of
significantly contributing species in the process can be obtained and the
spectral noise can be reduced in the process of reconstitution of the spectral
family. The reconstituted spectral family composed of the first two basis
vectors only is shown in Figure 2, along with the raw
data (inset).
The species represented as basis spectra are not necessarily
distinct chemical species but may be linear combinations of spectra that improve
the fit to the data. In all of the other spectral analyses, HAmB-DOC had only
two significant (ascertained by their singular values) basis spectral vectors,
which resembled the initial primarily self-associated form (S1) and a difference
spectrum between this form and the monomer (S2). AmB-DOC spectral families
occasionally demonstrated a third species that was small but significant. This
may be indicative of the auto-oxidation process due to the greater propensity of
AmB-DOC to photo- and air oxidize as compared to HAmB-DOC (see below and8 ).
Because our samples were degassed and purged with argon, photo-oxidation is the
most likely contributor.

Results
As shown previously, we observed a marked blue shift of the
absorption maximum of AmB-DOC to ~320 nm from ~330 nm after heat treatment
8,9. The CD spectra (data not shown) showed a weak bilobed band that also
shifted correspondingly, demonstrating complete or nearly complete conversion of
AmB-DOC to HAmB-DOC.
Sample Oxidation
One concern with diode array detection systems is that
potentially light sensitive samples are exposed continuously to a broad spectrum
of a 150-watt xenon lamp source. Because Amphotericin B is light and oxygen
sensitive and susceptible to autooxidation, we looked at light sensitivity in
our system under relatively harsh conditions. With our light source slits open
to 0.50 mm (before the fiber optic light guide) and no attempt to remove
dissolved oxygen from the samples, a significant amount of photo and/or air
oxidation was observed with both HAmB-DOC and AmB-DOC (Figure 3a,b) over the course of a 500-second exposure.
However, as observed by Gaboriau8 , heat treatment provided
some protection (24 vs. 48% lost for AmB-DOC) against drug oxidation. In
addition, there are other interesting features to the difference spectra of the
time = 0 - time = 500 seconds. The difference spectra absorption maximum
corresponds closely to the maxima of the species' respective oligomer
forms (Amax = ~319 nm and 333 nm for HAmB-DOC and AmB-DOC, respectively).
Furthermore, even when diluted to a final (AmB) of 1.6 µM, where more
monomer is present (Figure 3c), still only the oligomer
is lost to oxidation.
This is consistent with previous results showing that an
aggregated species undergoes an autooxidation process resulting in free radical
formation6,7. The fact that HAmB-DOC oxidation difference spectrum does not
have a significant shoulder at 433 nm indicates that there is not a significant
interconversion to the oxidation-sensitive self-associated species found in
AmB-DOC. This implies that an AmB-DOC to HAmB-DOC transition is essentially
irreversible. In practice, we found that degassing and saturating samples with
argon, and reducing the optical slit width to 0.2 mm or less (which required an
increase in the integration time to ~10 msec to obtain reasonable signal/noise)
was adequate to prevent most degradation.
Kinetics and SVD of AmB Release and Redistribution
Kinetics and SVD of AmB release and redistribution upon
dilution into our systems demonstrate complexity. The
dissociation/redistribution spectral families obtained from the 1:11 and 1:26
dilutions could not be well fitted globally by a first-order process in any
case. This is the case, despite the apparent presence of an isosebestic point in
nearly all of the spectral families, which would normally suggest a simple
two-species interconversion (e.g., dimer to monomer). In the global fitting
procedure, the best fit was assumed to be the one with the smallest number of
exponentials giving reasonable residuals. Where possible, it is preferable use a
known basis spectrum to aid in the fit. A representative aqueous monomer
spectrum was generated for this purpose by dilution of an AmB-DOC solution to
0.4 x 10-7 M and allowed to dissociate at 37°C until no further change in
absorbance at 409 nm was observed. This basis spectrum was used in cases where
the absorption maxima of the evolving species were the same as the aqueous
monomer. In addition, the 9.1 mM AmB-DOC was visually determined to dissociate
nearly 100% into 10 mole percent ergosterol /eggPC vesicles into a new
monomer-like species. This putative ergosterol-associated form has principal
absorption transitions at 416, 389, 370, and 354 nm in contrast to transitions
of 409, 385, 365, and 346 nm in the aqueous monomer. This basis spectrum was
used in cases where the absorption maxima of the evolving species were the same
as the ergosterol-associated monomer. In contrast, in the presence of 10 mole
percent cholesterol-containing vesicles, there was no apparent unique
cholesterol-bound species. Instead, the evolving spectrum was indistinguishable
from the aqueous monomer as determined by its absorption maxima.
There are many potential kinetic models of AmB dissociation.
We chose the following models for global fitting:
(1) A→M
(2) A→A2→M
(3) A→A2→A3→M
(4) A→M
A2→M
(5) A→M
A→M
A2→M
A3→M
where A is an initial AmB aggregate, A2 is a different
aggregate, A3 is a third type of aggregate, M is "monomer" (ergosterol-bound or
free aqueous). Since all spectra were produced from rapidly diluted 100 µM
AmB, the initial spectrum at time = ~10 msec reflected an aggregated species
8. The observed basis spectra generated by the global kinetic fits suggest a rapid conversion from one spectroscopically distinct aggregate state with a blue
shifted peak to another similar one. Physically, this could represent the
dissociation of large aggregates into smaller oligomeric units (minimum: dimer)
or aggregates of different sizes and/or compositions with only slightly
different spectra. In the case of AmB-DOC, for example, it has been show that
micellar aggregates of polydisperse sizes and AmB:DOC ratios exist and develop
with time upon reconstitution of the dried mixture14.
As an example of the process, the dissociation/redistribution
of AmB from the two delivery systems into fungal mimetic membrane vesicles (10
mole percent ergosterol/egg PC) is shown in Figures 4 and
5. The figures are global fitting-generated basis
spectra, or wavelength dependent amplitudes (Figures 4a, 5a) and concentration profiles over time of these species (Figures 4b, 5b) generated from SVD-processed diode array data sets.
The set of data used for the analysis of the HAmB-DOC (Figure 5 is the same as that in Figure 1. The global kinetic analysis fitted the data adequately with a sequential
first-order reaction scheme A→A2→M, as shown in Figures 4 and 5, though marginal
improvements in the residuals and variance could be made by including an
additional component in a A→A2→A3→M type of scheme
(not shown). The characteristic ergosterol-associated AmB spectrum was used as
the target basis spectrum for "M" for both fits. In this way, direct comparison
of the rate of production of an ergosterol-associated species could be made
between HAmB-DOC and AmB-DOC. The global fits show that transfer from the
AmB-DOC aggregate to the ergosterol-associated form is much more rapid
kinetically (essentially 100% after 200 seconds) than from the HAmB-DOC
aggregate (~20% after 200 seconds). This demonstrates again the kinetic
stability conferred by this simple heat treatment. Global fitting with parallel
first-order reaction schemes such as4 and5 above produced unreasonable
basis spectra (e.g., negative absorption coefficients) for either
system.
Individual kinetic traces at the most intense monomer
absorption transition wavelength for AmB-DOC and HAmB-DOC
dissociation/redistribution and their fits (using kinetic model2 ) are shown
in Figure 6a through 6d. In PBS buffer, rapid dilution
of AmB-DOC and HAmB-DOC from 100 to 3.8 mM leads to a production of a typical
AmB aqueous monomer with an absorption maximum of 408-409 nm (Figure 6a, Table 1).
Both processes could be adequately fitted by two sequential
first-order reactions, with the final species, M, basis spectrum fixed as an
aqueous monomer spectrum. The global fits for both yielded similar rate
constants, with the rate-limiting step being the production of the free aqueous
monomer. The major difference was the greater amplitude of the AmB-DOC system in
this region, demonstrating the greater kinetic instability of the
self-associated species of AmB in AmB-DOC. A similar process was observed for
the dilution of AmB-DOC and HAmB-DOC from 100 to 9.1 mM in the presence of 1.1
mg/ml 10 mole percent cholesterol/egg PC LUV (Figure 6b).
The absorption maxima of the species generated were identical
to the aqueous form of AmB and suggest little direct interaction with the
cholesterol or the lipids. In contrast, as outlined above, there are major
differences in the rate of redistribution as well as the resultant spectrum
(Table 1) in the presence of 1.1 mg/ml 10 mole
percent ergosterol/egg PC LUV, which indicate a strong and rapid interaction of
AmB with ergosterol (especially from AmB-DOC) and essentially no free aqueous
monomer in either (Figure 6c).
A major difference in the amplitude of the redistribution of
AmB from these two systems is also apparent in Figure 6d, where the diluent is whole bovine serum previously diluted 1:6 with PBS.
This situation is most similar to the "real" environment of
therapeutically used AmB, which is generally administered parenterally. It can
be seen that "monomeric" AmB dissociates more rapidly from the AmB-DOC system
than HAmB-DOC. The very distinct absorption maximum shift of the monomer-like
state from the aqueous 408 nm to 414 nm suggests that AmB is protein or
lipoprotein-bound.
Activity of AmB-DOC and HAmB-DOC Against Mammalian and Fungal Mimetic Membranes
The comparative activities of AmB-DOC and HAmB-DOC against 10
mole percent ergosterol and 10 mole percent cholesterol-containing egg PC
membrane vesicles are shown in Figures 7 and 8. Not surprisingly, the AmB-DOC concentrations
required to produce significant ion currents in ergosterol-containing vesicles
were much lower than in cholesterol-containing vesicles (Figure 7).
This is consistent with the observation that monomeric AmB is
primarily active against fungi and ergosterol-containing membranes, whereas a
"soluble aggregate" form is thought to be most active against sterol-free and
cholesterol-containing membranes and hence is most toxic toward mammalian cells
15. The most striking contrast between AmB-DOC and HAmB-DOC, however, is in
their activities against cholesterol-containing membranes. At 2.0 mM, AmB-DOC
and AmB made from a 1-mM DMSO stock showed considerable, K+ selective ion
current activity (Figure 8).
In contrast, the same concentration of HAmB-DOC initially
showed almost no activity and only after a considerable lag (>60 seconds)
began to exhibit some modest activity. The differences were not nearly as great
against the ergosterol-containing vesicles, especially at very low
concentrations (0.25mM), where both preparations would be expected to be largely
monomeric and hence equally active8. If each extruded vesicle is assumed to
be 100 nm in diameter, 0.25 mM amounts to only ~18 AmB molecules/vesicle. At
progressively greater concentrations, the AmB-DOC became more active than
HAmB-DOC, as one would expect from the kinetic results above.

Discussion
AmB is an extremely effective antifungal drug, yet its use is
severely restricted due to its high toxicity. In the quest to make AmB a more
generally useful drug, many different pharmaceutical preparations have been
made; all of which involve complexation of AmB in lipid or sterol salt mixtures
having many different supramolecular structures. Recently, a comparative study
of four AmB delivery systems was carried out by Legrand et al.16. Short-term
toxicity against fungi was associated with relative monomer release from a
stable core supramolecular structure, but damage to red blood cells (and by
implication, humans) was associated with a lack of thermodynamic stability and
increased self-association at concentrations >1mM. The latter undesirable
features are associated with solutions of AmB-DOC and AmB produced from solvent
stocks. In fact, the water-soluble self-associated form of AmB has been
identified as the culprit with red blood cell toxicity5, 15. The
attractiveness of the HAmB-DOC systems lies in the fact that it seems to be the
least complicated way to "repackage" AmB into a less toxic form. In fact,
deoxycholate is not even necessary to produce this characteristic heat-treated
form8; it is merely convenient, as it is widely available as a commercial
preparation (Fungizone).
We have observed several important features imparted by the
heat treatment. HAmB-DOC dissociates into monomers or monomer-like species to a
lesser extent and generally more slowly into all model systems as compared to
AmB-DOC. There seem to be only two significantly changing species
spectroscopically by model-independent analysis of the singular value
decomposition of HAmB-DOC, whereas AmB-DOC sometimes has three significant
components. The complexity of the kinetics, however, points to the probability
that the HAmB-DOC is a heterogeneous or evolving preparation. There have been
previous observations of AmB-DOC micelle kinetic instability, heterogeneity of
composition, and polydispersity6, 14, 17. These authors noted that almost
immediately upon reconstitution of dry AmB-DOC, the aggregate size steadily
increased over a period of ~10 hours. Longer incubation revealed that gelatinous
aggregates consisted largely of AmB, whereas the DOC remained wholly in
solution. It is possible that our heat treatment accelerates this process of
dissociation of AmB-DOC micelles followed by reassociation of AmB molecules.
Stock solution solvents, concentrations, and compositions have also been shown
to influence the size and nature of AmB self-associated species5.
Despite the enhanced kinetic stability of the HAmB-DOC
self-associated species, we have shown that the preparation still retains nearly
as much K+ selective ion channel activity against ergosterol-containing targets
(Figure 7), especially at concentrations less than 1 mM
of total AmB, where the monomeric form of both preparations predominates8.
The monomeric state of AmB has previously been shown to be optimally selective
for ergosterol binding when dispersed in large amounts of DOC or when monomeric
in the aqueous phase with monolayers18,19. In contrast, the HAmB-DOC
preparation at higher concentrations is much less active against cholesterol
containing targets (Figure 8). This last observation is
important mechanistically because more of the HAmB-DOC than AmB-DOC is expected
to be present in a self-associated form. There is considerable evidence that AmB
is most active against cholesterol-containing or sterol-free membranes through
the action of a specific soluble self-associated form4,5. It is clear then
that this particular oligomeric form produced by heat treatment does not have
this propensity and does not appreciably reconvert to the toxic soluble
oligomer.
The interactions of these two preparations with serum is most
interesting pharmaceutically because it more accurately reflects their condition
upon therapeutic introduction to a subject. As with ergosterol-containing
membranes, there is a markedly increased extent of monomerization with AmB-DOC,
but the monomeric state seems to be protein and/or lipoprotein associated, as
indicated by the spectral redshift (Table 1). A
contributing factor to this enhanced "disassembly" of the AmB-DOC complex may be
the known affinity of cholate and deoxycholate for serum albumin20-22. AmB
itself is also known to have at least two binding sites to albumin23.
Whatever the specific location(s) of the bound monomer-like species, there is no
spectroscopic evidence in either the case of the AmB-DOC or HAmB-DOC that a
significant fraction of aqueous monomer exists even in the presence of dilute
serum. In fact, a recent surface-enhanced Raman study has shown that even at 10
-5 M AmB in serum there is less than 10-8 M of free monomeric AmB in solution
24. In light of this, the ion permeability results in Figures 7 and 8 in the absence of serum
must be evaluated carefully when extrapolating to AmB toxicity/efficacy in
animal disease models25,26. Because there is probably no appreciable soluble
monomer in a real system, the mechanism of toxicity against fungi and toxic
effects against host cells must involve differential AmB transfer by contact
with or uptake of proteins and/or lipoproteins by host cells. In fact, it has
been shown in an endothelial cell culture system that the presence of calf serum
can actually be protective against direct cellular membrane injury by AmB27.

Conclusion
It has long been known that AmB associates extensively and
rapidly with serum lipoproteins and proteins28. In fact, due to the high
relative concentrations of serum protein to lipoprotein, a major fraction of AmB
(not AmB-DOC) was shown to be protein rather than lipoprotein associated28.
Different liposomal or micellar formulations of AmB have different distribution
profiles in HDL vs. LDL fractions. There is a strong correlation between the
binding of AmB to different lipoprotein fractions and human toxicity. The extent
of binding to lipoproteins is associated with many additional factors, such as
cholesterol content and diet history29. It appears that the AmB delivery
systems that bind primarily to LDL are generally more toxic to humans than those
that bind to HDL, possibly due to systemic uptake via the LDL receptor
30-32,33. All of this suggests that the complete story of the improvement of
therapeutic index with heat-induced resculpting of AmB aggregates probably
involves changes in distribution into and interaction with various serum
fractions, as well as the intrinsic reduction of activity against
cholesterol-containing membranes. These differential interactions will be the
subject of a future report.

Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Science Foundation (MCB-9603582).

References
1.
Hartsel, S. and J. Bolard, Amphotericin B: new life for an
old drug. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 1996;17:445-449.
[PUBMED]
2.
Hiemenz, J.W. and T.J. Walsh, Lipid formulations of
amphotericin B: recent progress and future directions. Clin Infect Dis. 1996;22:133-144.
[PUBMED]
3.
Brajtburg, J. and J. Bolard, Carrier effects on biological
activity of amphotericin B. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1996;9:512-531.
[PUBMED]
4.
Bolard, J., P. Legrand, F. Heitz, and B. Cybulska,
One-sided action of amphotericin B on cholesterol-containing membranes is
determined by its self-association in the medium. Biochemistry. 1991;30:5707-5715.
[PUBMED]
5.
Legrand, P., E.A. Romero, B.E. Cohen, and J. Bolard,
Effects of Aggregation and Solvent on the Toxicity of Amphotericin-B to Human
Erythrocytes. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1992;36:2518-2522.
[PUBMED]
6.
Lamy-Freund, M.T., V.F.N. Ferreira, A. Faljonialario, and
S. Schreier, Effect of Aggregation on the Kinetics of Autoxidation of the
Polyene Antibiotic Amphotericin-B. J Pharm Sci. 1993;82:162-166.
[PUBMED]
7.
Lamy-Freund, M.T., V.F. Ferreira, and S. Schreier,
Mechanism of inactivation of the polyene antibiotic amphotericin B. Evidence for
radical formation in the process of autooxidation. J Antibiot (Tokyo). 1985;38:753-757.
[PUBMED]
8.
Gaboriau, F., M. Cheron, L. Leroy, and J. Bolard,
Physico-Chemical properties of the heat-induced 'superaggregates' of
amphotericin B. Biophysical Chemistry, 1997;66:1-12.
[PUBMED]
9.
Gaboriau, F., M. Cheron, C. Petit, and J. Bolard,
Heat-induced superaggregation of amphotericin B reduces its in vitro toxicity: a
new way to improve its therapeutic index. Antimicrob Agents Chemother.
1997;41:2345-2351.
[PUBMED]
10.
Petit, C., V. Yardley, F. Gaboriau, J. Bolard, and S.L.
Croft, Activity of a heat-induced reformulation of amphotericin B deoxycholate
(fungizone) against Leishmania donovani [In Process Citation]. Antimicrob Agents Chemother.1999;43:390-392.
[PUBMED]
11.
Ruckwardt, T., A. Scott, J. Scott, P. Mikulecky, and S.C.
Hartsel, Lipid and stress dependence of amphotericin B ion selective channels in
sterol-free membranes. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1998;1372:283-288.
[PUBMED]
12.
Henry, E.R.a.H., J., Singular Value Decomposition:
Application to Analysis of Experimental Data, in Numerical Computer Methods,
L.a.J. Brand, M. L., Editor. 1992, Academic Press, Inc.: p. 129-192.
13.
Fujii, G., J.E. Chang, T. Coley, and B. Steere, The
formation of amphotericin B ion channels in lipid bilayers. Biochemistry. 1997;36:4959-4968.
[PUBMED]
14.
Lamy-Freund, M.T., S. Schreier, R.M. Peitzsch, and W.F.
Reed, Characterization and time dependence of amphotericin B: deoxycholate
aggregation by quasielastic light scattering. J Pharm Sci. 1991;80:262-2666.
[PUBMED]
15.
Hartsel, S.C., C. Hatch, W. Ayenew, How Does Amphotericin
B Work? :Studies on Model Systems. Journal of Liposome Research. 1993;3:377-408.
[PUBMED]
16.
Legrand, P., M. Cheron, L. Leroy, and J. Bolard, Release
of amphotericin B from delivery systems and its action against fungal and
mammalian cells. Journal of Drug Targeting. 1997;4:311-319.
17.
Lamy-Freund, M.T., V.F. Ferreira, and S. Schreier,
Polydispersity of aggregates formed by the polyene antibiotic amphotericin B and
deoxycholate. A spin label study. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1989;981:207-212.
[PUBMED]
18.
Barwicz, J. and P. Tancrede, The effect of aggregation
state of amphotericin-B on its interactions with cholesterol- or
ergosterol-containing phosphatidylcholine monolayers. Chem Phys Lipids. 1997;85:145-155.
[PUBMED]
19.
Tancrede, P., J. Barwicz, S. Jutras, and I. Gruda, The
effect of surfactants on the aggregation state of Amphotericin B. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1990;1030:289-95.
[PUBMED]
20.
Ceryak, S., B. Bouscarel, and H. Fromm, Comparative
binding of bile acids to serum lipoproteins and albumin. J Lipid Res. 1993;34:1661-1674.
[PUBMED]
21.
Meyuhas, D. and D. Lichtenberg, The effect of albumin on
the state of aggregation and phase transformations in phosphatidylcholine-sodium
cholate mixtures. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1995;1234:203-213.
[PUBMED]
22.
Passing, R. and D. Schubert, The binding of deoxycholic
acid to band 3 protein from human erythrocyte membranes and to bovine serum
albumin. Hoppe Seylers Z Physiol Chem. 1983;364:219-226.
[PUBMED]
23.
Romanini, D., B. Farruggia, and G. Pico, Absorption and
fluorescence spectra of polyene antibiotics in the presence of human serum
albumin. Biochem Mol Biol Int. 1998;44:595-603.
[PUBMED]
24.
Ridente, Y., J. Aubard, and J. Bolard, Absence in
amphotericin B-spiked human plasma of the free monomeric drug, as detected by
SERS. FEBS Lett. 1999;446:283-286.
[PUBMED]
25.
Petit, C., V. Yardley, F. Gaboriau, J. Bolard, and S.L.
Croft, Activity of a heat-induced reformulation of amphotericin B deoxycholate
(fungizone) against Leishmania donovani. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1999;43:390-392.
[PUBMED]
26.
Petit, C., M. Cheron, V. Joly, J.M. Rodrigues, J. Bolard,
and F. Gaboriau, In-vivo therapeutic efficacy in experimental murine mycoses of
a new formulation of deoxycholate-amphotericin B obtained by mild heating [In
Process Citation]. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1998;42:779-785.
[PUBMED]
27.
Cutaia, M., S.R. Bullard, K. Rudio, and S. Rounds,
Characteristics of Amphotericin-B Induced Endothelial Cell Injury. J Lab Clin Med. 1993;121:244-256.
[PUBMED]
28.
Brajtburg, J., Elberg, S., Bolard, J., Kobayashi, G. S.,
Levy, R. A., Ostlund, R. E., Jr., Schlessinger, D. and G. Medoff, Interaction of
plasma proteins and lipoproteins with amphotericin B. J Infect Dis. 1984;149:986-997.(1) Brajtburg, J., Elberg, S.
[PUBMED]
29.
Chavanet, P., V. Joly, D. Rigaud, J. Bolard, C. Carbon,
and P. Yeni, Influence of Diet on Experimental Toxicity of Amphotericin B
Deoxycholate. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1994;38:963-968.
[PUBMED]
30.
Vertut-Doi, A., S.I. Ohnishi, and J. Bolard, The endocytic
process in CHO cells, a toxic pathway of the polyene antibiotic amphotericin B. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1994;38:2373-2379.
[PUBMED]
31.
Wasan, K.M., R.E. Morton, M.G. Rosenblum, and G.
Lopez-Berestein, Decreased toxicity of liposomal amphotericin B due to
association of amphotericin B with high-density lipoproteins: role of lipid
transfer protein. J Pharm Sci. 1994;83:1006-1010.
[PUBMED]
32.
Wasan, K.M. and G. Lopezberestein, The interaction of
liposomal amphotericin B and serum lipoproteins within the biological milieu. J Drug Target. 1994;2:373-380.
[PUBMED]
33.
Wasan, K.M. and J.S. Conklin, Enhanced amphotericin B
nephrotoxicity in intensive care patients with elevated levels of low-density
lipoprotein cholesterol. Clin Infect Dis. 1997;24:78-80.
[PUBMED]

|