Scientific Journals
News and Features
AAPS Meetings and Education
  Products and Services
  AAPS Member Services
  AAPS Press Room
  Marketing Opportunities
  Affiliated Organizations
  Join AAPS

View PDF Version 
View Text-Only Version
View Small Version
View Full Version
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Acknowledgements
References

Scientific Journals: AAPS PharmSci

Kleinebudde P, Jumaa M and Saleh F Influence of the Degree of Polymerization on the Behavior of Cellulose During Homogenization and Extrusion/Spheronization AAPS PharmSci 2000; 2 (3) article 21 (https://www.pharmsci.org/scientificjournals/pharmsci/journal/21.html).

Figures and Tables

Table 1. Properties of Microcrystalline Cellulose the Various Investigated Cellulose Types

Cellulose Type

Degree of Polymerization

Crystallinity Index

Mean Diameter* [µm]

Mean Diameter**

[µm]

MCC

166

75.4

22.5

52.9

MCC

190

74.5

22.2

114.0

MCC

225

68.9

22.5

51.5

MCC

245

74.1

24.3

61.5

MCC

299

71.1

27.8

61.0

MCC

345

67.1

26.9

54.7

MCC

365

71.8

26.7

109.4

PC

1431

35.8

27.3

30.7

*Mean particle size [D50] of 9% presuspension before the homogenization.

**Mean particle size [D50] of dry cellulose powder.




Figure 1.Cellulose behavior (microcrystalline and powdered) with various degree of polymerization values during the homogenization process after different cycles at 40 MPa.


Figure 2.Correlation between the particle size and the degree of polymerization values after the homogenization process (6 cycles, 40 MPa).


Figure 3.Influence of homogenization cycles at 40 MPa pressure on the apparent viscosity of different microcrystalline and powdered cellulose types.


Figure 4.Dried filter cakes of homogenized suspensions of different cellulose types.


Figure 5.Effect of the degree of polymerization of the used cellulose on the extrudate water content and pellet porosity.


Figure 6.Influence of the degree of polymerization on the fracture force.


Figure 7.Correlation between particle size D50 and D99 of the various investigated cellulose types after homogenization (6 cycles, 40 MPa) with the extrudate water content.


Figure 8.Scanning electron microscope pictures of the starting powders and the surface of the resulting pellets for DP225 (Avicel PH101) and DP1431 (Elcema P050).

Table 2. Comparison Between the Behavior of Cellulose With Low and High DP

Low DP (Gel Model)

High DP (Sponge Model)

Marked reduction in the particle size

Small reduction in the particle size

Less water needed (immobilized water)

More water needed (absorbed water)

Deformation of MCC during the extrusion process

No deformation of MCC during the extrusion process

More shrinking during the drying process

Less shrinking during the drying process

Low porosity of dried pellets

High porosity of dried pellets

CURRENT ARTICLES
CONTENTS
    -Volume 4 Issue 2
    -Volume 4 Issue 1
    -Volume 3 Issue 4
    -Volume 3 Issue 3
    -Volume 3 Issue 2
    -Volume 3 Issue 1
    -Volume 2 Issue 4
    -Volume 2 Issue 3
    -Volume 2 Issue 2
    -Volume 2 Issue 1
    -Volume 1 Issue 4
    -Volume 1 Issue 3
    -Volume 1 Issue 2
    -Volume 1 Issue 1
SPECIAL ISSUES
SEARCH
Editorial Boards
Instructions to Authors
RESOURCES
    -Online Review System
    -About AAPS PharmSci
    -Calls for Papers
    -F.A.Q.
Contact Us!